🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to restart atomic negotiations with Washington on condition that it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

The Iranian diplomat stated solely negotiations was effective, and revealed recent overtures had come from mediators to restart discussions with the US government. He claimed Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to allow the global atomic watchdog to access attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Course

The foreign minister is treading a difficult path since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be proceeding from a situation of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more resilient militarily and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Discussions Abruptly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious end on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the US president asserting the facilities had been obliterated. Afterward, European countries employed their privilege to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Tehran representatives said they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was decided an local partnership with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could work within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Representatives stated three times they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Situation

Tehran representatives declared the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be resurrected in certain ways if negotiations reopen.

The US president recently claimed he had been getting signals that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but privately Iran's diplomats say they are not yet receiving clear proposals from America either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of inactivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his speech to the forum, designed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the notion of worldwide standards, the foreign minister said the fortnight-long engagement revealed the clash could not be ended by military means. He said the attacks started with a US demand for an total Iran submission and ended with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were carried out with total Washington understanding and coordination, making confidence difficult to reestablish.

Negotiations Remains the Primary Solution

The foreign minister stated: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had consistently tried to impose their demands during the discussions. Dialogue can still be alive and remains the primary resolution to settle conflicts, but its requirements, rules and tenets must be respected."

"In case they talk to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and honor, they will get a answer in the same language."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the battle of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We gained numerous insights from this conflict; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We managed to survive this war. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to obliterate, continues to exist. The facilities and equipment, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but failed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have developed stronger, more integrated, and more endorsing of the administration and the state in the aftermath of this assault."